An interview technique developed by fisher and Geiselman in 1992 to increase the accuracy of EWT. There ar 4 main components.
1 and 2 are ground on the concept that the closer the recreated situation to the actual incident, the to a greater extent discipline will be recalled.
3 and 4 are based on the idea that information can be retrieved through a number of different ways into a somebodys brain and varying these can help the participant recall more.
Research into the effectiveness of the cognitive interview
Evaluating the cognitive interview
unwieldy to evaluate because there are many different forms
Thames vale Police do not use the bushel stage setting of use component.
Other police forces use still the reinstate context and report everything components
(Kebbell and Wagstaff 1996)
Negatives
Takes too much time, especially for minor crimes
Detectives only receive 4 hr training which did not lay down significantly different results to standard techniques (Mernon et al.
1994)
Positives
Effective (see research above)
somebody differences
Ginet and Verkampt 2007 investigated the effect of anxiety in the CI
They attached pretend electrodes to students when they were observation an video which were supposed to give electric shocks
CI partipants remembered more accurately and greater quantity than those interviewed with standard techniques
-----------------------
2
1
Report everything
Participants are encouraged to report every detail, even if it seems insignificant.
Mentally reinstate context
Participants are encouraged to mentally recreate the environment of the event
4
channelize the perspective
The participant is encouraged to review the incident from other points of view eg. what another witness would have seen
3
Change the score
The interviewer will drive to change the timeline of events...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.